Was this helpful?

(0) (0)

intacct-vs-mip-fund-accounting-NEEDS UPDATE

June 23rd, 2020 3 min read

MIP Fund Accounting and Sage Intacct are both accounting software that have strong reporting capabilities and extended accounting capabilities like payroll. They also each have features designed for nonprofit organizations. However, MIP Fund Accounting specializes in nonprofits and government agencies, while Sage Intacct is more broadly applicable, with additional light ERP capabilities. 

Sage Intacct is more commonly used by larger businesses or businesses experiencing rapid growth, as well as companies that benefit from ERP functions like inventory management native to their accounting system. In contrast, MIP Fund Accounting is more commonly used by small to midsize nonprofits, as well as higher education institutions or government agencies. 

Features

MIP Fund Accounting and Sage Intacct both have strong feature sets tailored to their target audiences.

MIP’s focus on nonprofits best serves those organizations with unique nonprofit accounting needs. For instance, MIP’s grant and fund tracking mechanism is among the best available and is the leading competitive advantage for the platform over more general accounting systems. MIP Fund Accounting’s customer support is also held in high regard by many reviewers. For nonprofits who may not have access to robust accounting departments, this level of customer support can be particularly impactful. 

Sage Intacct excels in its support for scaling businesses and organizations that require more specialized or customized deployments. When first implemented, Intacct allows organizations to tailor areas like data models and reports to their specific needs. This flexibility also allows users to adjust the platform and data structures as business needs grow and evolve over time, mitigating the risk of accounting bottlenecks and inefficiencies. 

Limitations

While both products have their respective strengths, MIP Fund Accounting and Sage Intacct also have some limitations, often around pricing and their ease of use. 

MIP’s weakness is the accessibility of its payroll and reporting capabilities. These functions have both been difficult for some users to utilize easily and effectively. The modularized pricing structure MIP offers can also be confusing for some organizations to navigate to ensure they’re getting the functionality they need. This modularized pricing system can also lead to unnecessary costs. 

Along similar lines, Sage Intacct’s customizability also entails a harsher learning curve. Training and learning on the platform can be difficult in general, but this process is exacerbated in customization-heavy areas, like reporting. It can also be cost-prohibitive for smaller companies, and costs can stack up if businesses require additional add-ons for more specialized accounting functions. 

Pricing 

Sage Intacct’s pricing varies with each customer. Concrete pricing numbers are available by quote from the vendor.

MIP Fund Accounting’s pricing is also specific to each customer. Pricing is available by quote from the vendor. 

Was this helpful?

(0) (0)

TrustRadius Weekly